On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:58:45AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 25 juin 2009 à 21:35 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi a écrit : > > Hi, > > I've noticed that there are a few packages that depend/recommend/suggest > > bluez-gnome and a few others (3, bluez-gnome gnome-bluetooth and blueman) > > that > > provide all the same functionality i.e. bluetooth-agent I think it might > > worthwhile a virtual package "bluetooth-agent", this way one can e.g. have > > gnome installed together with one among said agent implementations > > I don’t like the idea much, at least for the metapackages. I’d prefer to > ensure that we have one solution that is featureful and correctly > integrated with GNOME, rather than having to ensure that they are all > equivalent.
Fair enough, at least for bluez-gnome vs gnome-bluetooth even though the latter is preferred over the former (and this already fixed in meta-gnome) and should be stated as depend/suggest/recommend gnome-bluetooth | bluez-gnome. Anyhow, given that g-b should be preferred over b-g I'm not yet sure why blueman needs to conflict/replace bluez-gnome. filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net - 0x6B79D401 There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. -- William Shakespeare. Hamlet; Act II, scene ii -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org