Hi Peter, On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Peter S Galbraith<p.galbra...@globetrotter.net> wrote: > Ok, make sense. I will add some enabling code that can be used vis the > customization interface, similar to e.g. the variable > `ff-paths-install'. > > I will move alls etuup within quack.el to a new function which will be > invoked when this variable is set.
I think Sami's logic that the changes are too invasive to be enabled by default sounds about right. Thanks for taking the lead on this, I just left town for a conference so it's difficult for me to do any work on this for the next week, but if you keep me CC'd I can try to find some time to test the changes you make. Neil is around on #scheme where I hang out normally so if it looks like there's a way to support quack.el better for autoloading rather than through always manually requiring it I can also pass those on to him. Daniel -- Daniel Moerner <dmoer...@gmail.com> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
