On Friday 10 July 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:51 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Friday 10 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > > > On Friday 10 July 2009, dann frazier wrote: > > > > Maybe the -fwrapv change? > > > > > > Bingo. Makes a lot of sense too for an issue related to gcc > > > version. > > > > I've proposed the attached patch on lkml: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/10/49. > > Perhaps we should be using -fno-strict-overflow instead of simply > removing this option?
It looks like that option was only introduced with gcc 4.2. At least, I can't find it in the manual for gcc 4.1. So it would not make any difference for this bug. It does make the case a bit stronger to change my check to also allow -fwrapv for gcc 4.2 though. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org