On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 01:58:01PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Do you mean complete *.(tex|TEX|texinfo|texi)(-.) ? > > At least .tex and .TEX, probably not .texinfo and .texi, but I wonder > why these extensions are selected for latex.
Someone with the time and inclination can feel free to separate this out and add all the latexmk options. Index: Completion/Unix/Type/_tex =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/zsh/zsh/Completion/Unix/Type/_tex,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 _tex --- Completion/Unix/Type/_tex 26 Sep 2007 05:21:49 -0000 1.5 +++ Completion/Unix/Type/_tex 11 Jul 2009 01:47:48 -0000 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#compdef tex latex slitex pdflatex jadetex pdfjadetex xetex=tex xelatex=latex +#compdef tex latex slitex pdflatex jadetex pdfjadetex xetex=tex xelatex=latex latexmk local expl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org