On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:42:55PM +0800, LIU Qi wrote: > >I would like to adopt this package, but as far as I known little people >still use this package any more, because in fact the package stardict >is the newer version of stardic. I think the package stardic should be >removed.
Andrew, could you create a pseudo binary package named stardic in your source package stardict in such a way that the users of stardic can upgrade to stardict smoothly?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
