Hi Shriramana, I know the source package name is misleading, but I think that this is a very minor issue. Renaming it means that is has to go through the NEW queue, which is somewhat unpredictable, which is why I have put this off for now. Basically, it's a lot of hassle for not much gain, given that only very few people ever see the source package name.
best, Torsten -- .: Torsten Marek .: http://shlomme.diotavelli.net .: tors...@diotavelli.net -- GnuPG: 1024D/A244C858
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
