On söndagen den 2 augusti 2009, you stated the following: > Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > Now, the question is whether I should adopt the names you chose, battle > > it out with the pythons, or take a third option... > > What is the 3rd option you are talking about?
I don't know. Some other name. dkimsign-perl/dkimverify-perl or something. It's a bit unfortunate that policy doesn't allow extensions on executables in the default $PATH; that would have allowed us to have left the names as dkimsign.pl and dkimsign.py etc. -- Magnus Holmgren [email protected] Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
