On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:43:46PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hi Moritz > > >> - would you please be so kind to provide us the stricter regular > >> expression to match a binary kernel package? :) this way we can match > >> the current bin package name against the regex and do the voodoo magic > >> to force the report against linux-2.6 (yeah, this also means that if > >> you change the binary name structure, you should communicate us back > >> the new regexp). I could write myself, but I think that you would end > >> up with a much better one ;) > > > > The following matches should be safe: > > > > linux-doc-2.6* > > linux-headers-2.6* > > linux-image-2.6* > > linux-libc-dev > > linux-manual-2.6* > > linux-patch-debian-2.6* > > linux-source-2.6* > > linux-support-2.6* > > linux-tree-2.6* > > Oh, only now I think of it: does all those bin packages come from > linux-2.6 source package? if so, I think we can check if the source > package is 'linux-2.6' and force to assign all bugs for its bin pkgs > to it. > > What do you think?
If that's possible, that is the best solution. Thanks, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org