Tzafrir, Which patch?
http://tzafrir.org.il/rapid/zaptel_1.0.7-4.3.diff.gz has lots of stuff in it, but it isn't really obvious which patch you are talking about. Some things you have added above the baseline 1.0.7, there might a fix in there for the include files, but it isn't obvious quickly, so I can't apply it quicky? Can you provide a diff against svn.debian.org? I know we fixed this in #297306, but can't remember the solution. Is it simply a matter of: --- zaptel-1.0.9/debian/rules.orig 2005-07-13 15:35:18.595116648 +0100 +++ zaptel-1.0.9/debian/rules 2005-07-13 15:35:51.988040152 +0100 @@ -114,8 +114,6 @@ install -m 644 Makefile *.c *.h *.rbt debian/zaptel-source/usr/src/modules/zaptel install -m 644 zaphfc/* debian/zaptel-source/usr/src/modules/zaptel/zaphfc install -m 644 qozap/* debian/zaptel-source/usr/src/modules/zaptel/qozap - install -m 644 zaptel.h debian/zaptel-source/usr/include/linux/ - install -m 644 torisa.h debian/zaptel-source/usr/include/linux/ # Packaging infrastructure install -m 644 debian/*-modules.* debian/changelog debian/copyright \ Thanks, Mark On Wednesday 13 July 2005 11:01, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > I didn't yet get to test this, but just something I saw on the IRC: > > <fman> this is busted > <fman> yep > <fman> got this weird error though > <fman> dpkg: error processing > /usr/src/zaptel-modules-2.4.27-powerpc_1.0.9-2+2.4.27-10_powerpc.deb > (--install): > <fman> trying to overwrite `/usr/include/linux/zaptel.h', which is also in > package zaptel-source <fman> that file isn't there > > As you can see, this practiucally prevents a proper usage of zaptel. > Please fix ASAP. Or get the patch from my package (which ever comes > first) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]