In article <873a7poeoy....@jidanni.org>, jida...@jidanni.org writes: >>>>>> "K" == Kenichi Handa <ha...@m17n.org> writes: >>> In the trunk of CVS, I added CJK fonts for those box-drawing >>> characters in the default fontset. So, in CJK environment, >>> CJK fonts are preferred. Perhaps, the selected CJK font >>> claims that it has glyphs for those characters, but actually >>> doesn't contain valid glyphs. I think those vanishing >>> characters has at least 1 dot width of space. Please put >>> cursor on one of them and type C-u C-x = to check which font >>> is selected for it.
>>> • │ ┌ ┐ └ ┘ ├ ┤ ┬ ┴ ┼ > In emacs23, all are visible, and very nice > x:-efont-fixed-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-c-80-iso10646-1 > In emacs-snapshot all are invisible in w3m-el-snapshot, but visible but > ugly replying here in gnus. "•" is the same > x:-efont-fixed-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-c-80-iso10646-1 > but all the rest are > x:-eten-fixed-medium-r-normal--16-150-75-75-c-160-big5.eten-0 Your answer is too terse for me to understand your situation correctly. Do you mean that the same font: x:-eten-fixed-medium-r-normal--16-150-75-75-c-160-big5.eten-0 is selected for "│┌..." in the invisible case and in the ugly case? And what do you mean by "ugly"? Isn't it possible to provide the screen-shot of that ugly case? --- Kenichi Handa ha...@m17n.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org