>>>>> fant == Frank Küster [2009-8-21] fant> "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <sa...@debian.org> wrote:
fant> But I also think that your style of working is not encouraging for fant> collaborators. You actually *do* accept patches, sometimes as-is, fant> sometimes you take them as inspiration, but solve the issue your fant> way. That's okay. But you do not talk to the patch submitters, fant> you often don't tell them whether you think it's the right fant> approach, whether you'll fix the bug soon, or whether you plan an fant> upload at all. [...] Dear Frank, I understand that you have good points, so I'll do what you asked, at least this time, and hopefully for the future as well. I plan to upload auctex 11.83-8 today or tomorrow, as time permits; here is my latest changelog.Debian: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- auctex (11.83-8) unstable; urgency=medium * COPYRIGHT, copyright.in, variables: Update copyright. * control (Homepage): New field. * control (Standards-Version): Updated to 3.8.2. * control (auctex/Description): Reflow text. * control (preview-latex-style/Description): Fix typo (unpublished change obsoleted by 11.83-7.1 NMU); thanks to Rafael Laboissiere. (Closes: #440397) * control (preview-latex-style/Homepage): New field. * po/cs.po, po/de.po, po/es.po, po/eu.po, po/fi.po, po/fr.po, po/gl.po, po/it.po, po/ja.po, po/nl.po, po/pt.po, po/pt_BR.po, po/ru.po, po/sv.po, po/vi.po: Normalized. * po/it.po: Updated. * auctex/templates.in: Reflow text. Keep debian-l10n-english team review comment from flowing to "auctex/templates". * control, rules.in (binary-indep-auctex), auctex/bug.script.in (FLAVORS), auctex/conffiles.in, auctex/install.in, auctex/remove.in, auctex/update-auctex-elisp.in (FLAVORS), auctex/update-auctex-install.in (FLAVORS): Add Emacs 23 support. (Closes: #539749, #540093) * config.in: No more need to register "doauto/logfile" here. * install.in (do_auto): Do not remove log files here. New log files names. * remove.in (undo_auto): Remove log files here. New log files names. (Closes: #508348) * update-auctex-install: New log files names. * variables (TMPMASK): Remove it. * variables (LOGFILE): New variable. * install.in (do_install): For each flavor, for every byte compiled file, install a symlink to the corresponding Elisp source from the installation directory to the source directories, for the sole purpose of allowing `find-function-search-for-symbol' (invoked by clicking on the help-function-def-button provided by a function definition help string) to find it. (Closes: #443930) * remove.in (undo_install): Remove the symlinks to the Elisp sources installed by "install.in (do_install)". * rules.in (binary-arch): Strip "$(checkdir)" and "$(checkroot)". [Lintian] * auctex/lintian.in: Fix "debconf-is-not-a-registry" overrides paths. Remove no more needed "maintainer-script-does-not-check-for-existence-of-installdocs" overrides. * auctex/update-auctex-install.in, auctex/lintian.in: Needs no more Debconf interaction. * preview-latex-style/lintian.in: Remove no more needed "maintainer-script-does-not-check-for-existence-of-installdocs" lintian overrides. * config.in: Implement Debconf backup capability. * rules.in (debconf-test, debconf-ask-for-translations): New phonies. * rules.in (build-package): Call lintian after building the package. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I still need to check latest policy (3.8.3), but I might also decide to upload with 3.8.2 standards, deferring possibly needed changes to a later moment (say one week). fant> He means (I think) that the problem is pressing enough for him to fant> want a solution *really*soon*. Since he can't NMU for a non-RC fant> bug without your explicit Okay, the only "solution" for him would fant> be to use a locally patched package, which is bad. Well, unfortunately, that's what I do as well, for a number of package, Debian or not, and I think that's what most of us do. Being free software allows us to do it, and we have a lot of nice VCSs to cope with it. It might be "bad" because it forces _us_ to do the work, but OTOH, as I understand it, forcing others to work doesn't really work outside commercial projects. fant> It seems you block people from testing emacs23 if one of their fant> main uses is TeX stuff. BTDT - using different emacs versions for fant> different tasks is not an option if you want to do real work. I feel people _testing_ emacs23 should now how to add something to the load-path variable. :-) Anyway, thank you for taking the time to elaborate on what you feel I was missing, I appreciate it. I will try to avoid disappointing reasonable people. -- Ciao, Davide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org