On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 06:48:46PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I think there is some misunderstanding here :)
No misunderstanding, I think, just my small outrage at the assumption that I was packaging something written in Java :) > Onkar suggests some structure like this in *your* project : > * build.xml : use ${lib.dir}/junit.jar > * build.properties : define lib.dir=lib/ > * lib/junit.jar : your own JUnit jar > (with all that your project will be portable accros distro and OS) Yeah, it's probably the best way, portably. But it also seems to make the point of a junit deb quite moot, from an individual Java developer's perspective. > - I'll not restore this link to /usr/share/ant/lib/ > - I'll add a NEWS.Debian about this in next upload This is ok with me. -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org