On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 04:25:37PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Given that devscripts, lintian, and the dev-ref > all advocate or implement +nmu\d+, and that debhelper and cdbs look > at the hyphen for determining native vs non-native, I have tried to do > so. I think the proposed practice is strictly better than not > specifying any conventions, and where possible, Ihave tried to stick to > best practices as documented in the dev-ref to base policy on.
> Having said that, there are a lot of packages that seem to still > use versions like m/\-\d+\.\d+$/, so perhaps we should be couching this > policy change as a 'recommends', and letting lintian warn about the > version number. I don't agree that this is something that should be recommended. Changing the convention for NMU versioning of non-native packages is not necessary in order to correct the use of confusing version numbers for NMUs of native packages. If the dev-ref is recommending +nmuN for non-native packages, then I think that's a bug in the dev-ref - a common enough problem given the lack of a public process for dev-ref change reviews. Recommending use of +nmuN for native packages seems like an appropriate thing for Policy to standardize, since using hyphens makes the package versions appear non-native and appending ".N" to the version collides with ordinary versioning conventions for native packages. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
