On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:41:38 +0200, Felix wrote in message <[email protected]>:
> reassign 543795 dmsetup > reopen 543795 > retitle 543795 new udev rules of dmsetup 2:1.02.36-2 not applied > correctly thanks > > Am Samstag, den 05.09.2009, 12:11 +0200 schrieb Arnt Karlsen: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:03:19 +0000, Debian wrote in message > > <[email protected]>: > > > > > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > > > which was filed against the grub-pc package: > > > > > > #543795: grub-pc: ..with /dev/dm-0 as /, "grub-probe: error: > > > cannot find a device for /" > > > > > > It has been closed by Felix Zielcke <[email protected]>. > > > > > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original > > > report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not > > > received a better one in a separate message then please contact > > > Felix Zielcke <[email protected]> by replying to this email. > > > > > > > ..hum, it still needs "echo change > /sys/block/dm-0/uevent " > > Ok, reassigning now to dmsetup. > I don't know anything about udev, so I can't help with this. > But you're not the only one for whom an update of dmsetup and a reboot > didn't fix the problem. ..er, I forgot to reboot. ;o) > > and it still segfaults on > > /usr/lib/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib: line 95: \ > > 1398 Segmentation fault \ > > ${grub_probe} -t fs $path > /dev/null 2>&1 \ > > before it succeeds setting up itself, cli snip: > > still ? > The segfault was introduced in in beta2-1 and should be now fixed in > beta2-2 which should hit the mirrors now. ..yup, and the segfault is gone. ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
