Colin Watson wrote:
> - if (! -d "$tmp/usr/share/doc/$package") {
> - # If it is a dangling symlink, then don't do anything.
> - # Think multi-binary packages that depend on each other and
> - # want to link doc dirs.
> - next if -l "$tmp/usr/share/doc/$package";
> + # If it is a symlink to a documentation directory from the same
> + # source package, then don't do anything. Think multi-binary
> + # packages that depend on each other and want to link doc dirs.
> + if (-l "$tmp/usr/share/doc/$package") {
> + my $linkval=readlink("$tmp/usr/share/doc/$package");
> + my %allpackages=map { $_ => 1 } getpackages();
> + if ($allpackages{basename($linkval)}) {
> + next;
> + }
> + # Even if the target doesn't seem to be a doc dir from the
> + # same source package, don't do anything if it's a dangling
> + # symlink.
> + next unless -d "$tmp/usr/share/doc/$package";
> + }
>
> + if (! -d "$tmp/usr/share/doc/$package") {Why does it need to check that the link points to a binary package from the same source? The result seems to be the same whether or not that is the case. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
