I believe this is because libjack0.100 conflicts with libjack0.80. This should not be the case -- why give them different names if they could not be installed simultaneously?
- Bug#318098: Malcolm Smith
- Bug#318098: Robert Jordens
I believe this is because libjack0.100 conflicts with libjack0.80. This should not be the case -- why give them different names if they could not be installed simultaneously?