Florian Weimer wrote:
* MJ Ray:
cate wrote:
Eugen Dedu wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
I think there is a problem in terminology. AFAIK (but IANAL), the
"any use" doesn't include distribution of software.
For this reason I think it is safe to classify it as non distributable,
It seems that the author intention was to interpret the "any use" in
a wider manner, but this is not legally safe for us.
I'd agree with that unless someone can tell me why not.
Surprise, surprise---it does include distribution:
ok, good! So IMHO (IANAL) the license is free according DFSG.
Unfortunately this statement was not in the original bug report.
The other licenses in bug report seems OK, but also this time I read only
the bug report + responses: I've not looked in the sources
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
