On Monday 25 May 2009 02:18:11 Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:54:37PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > On Friday 29 February 2008, CJ van den Berg wrote: > > > can you explain why you consider this a pulseaudio bug? I don't know > > > too much about SELinux I'm afaid, but this looks like a problem with > > > the SELinux policy. I don't see how pulseaudio is supposed to > > > avoid/solve this problem. > > > > Yes, now the ownership issue has been addressed. It should be re-assigned > > to the selinux policy package. > > There was no clear indication to wether each individual package should > > provide a policy or not. Now that has been made clear. > > > > Can you please re-assign it to the selinux package ? > > Could you retest with pulseaudio 0.9.15 >
Sorry for the delayed response. I haven't seen this issue lately. But I can't recollect when I stopped seeing this. Currently I am on 0.9.18 and don't see this issue. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
