Le lundi 18 juillet 2005 à 23:38 +0200, Robert Jordens a écrit : > Hello! > > [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > > On second thought this probably requires NUMing mpich as well, as the > > mpich version seems to be statically linked to libpmpich++. I'll see if > > I have time for these. > > lam is linked statically against mpich. But libmpich++ is shipped with > lam and lam builds and links against that. That is bad and incorrect but > subject of another yet-to-file bug.
Whoa ? LAM is linked against mpich ? Aren't they two independent implementations of MPI ? > I'm planning the NMU of lam. Thanks. I guess we also need a NMU of mpich, so that libmpich++ is rebuilt. Modifying mpicc.mpich to use dynamic linking would be a good idea as well. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
