On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 04:51:57AM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 13:10 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 03:46:20AM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 08:16 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > Package: videolink > > > > Severity: important > > > > Tags: patch > > > > > > > > Xulrunner 1.9.1 is going to replace xulrunner 1.9 in unstable sometime > > > > soonish, so videolink should switch to using it. > > > > > > > > As a matter of being future-proof, a dh_xulrunner program has been added > > > > to xulrunner-dev, that will add the proper dependency to shlibs:Depends. > > > > > > > > Please note that the package supporting this command is not yet in the > > > > archive and should reach experimental some time today. > > > > > > > > The attached patch implements the necessary changes[1], > > > [...] > > > > > > No it does not. Some substantial source changes appear to be needed as > > > well. :-( > > > > Mmmm that's surprising, as "standard" browsers such as galeon and > > epiphany only need a rebuild. Does it totally fail to build or is it a > > runtime problem? > > It's a run-time problem - VideoLink depends on some interfaces which are > no longer implemented by the same objects.
Do you have a set of example files so that I can test a locally built package? Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
