[Missed 507...@b.d.o in my first reply, apologies for dupes.] # reopen 507966 = # thanks
Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but I believe this reply was intended for a different bug. Your salutation appears to be for someone not named previously on bug #507966. Agreed that it's sometimes worthwhile to support eggs. This patch would make it slightly cleaner for CDBS packages to do so. Regards, Greg > Coin, > > In fact, the Python team people decided to allow using eggs, for > development reasons for exemple, even if it is not officially > supported in Debian. It makes sense not to forbid such usage, even it > not recommended. You should really follow the recommandations on the > following page: > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPythonFAQ#Pythoneggs > > There is no reason to go against such decision, but you're welcome to > discuss it on the Python team mailing-list, and ask us to reconsider > this bug if a consensus is reached. Until then, i consider this not a > bug. > > Regards. > > -- > Marc Dequènes (Duck) ----- End forwarded message ----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
