On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 14:10 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote: > El Jueves 08 Octubre 2009, Ben Hutchings escribió: > > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:03 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Googling around I found this bug is quite old: > > > > > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0302.1/0966.html > > > > > > And this: > > > > > > http://fixunix.com/suse/125711-problem-via-rhine-ii-eth0.html > > > > > > It seems the fix is not the same for everyone. > > > > I don't think those are the same bug as this. > > > > > Supposing the only fix by now is a kernel option, should I close this > > > bug? > > > > No, it should stay open until there is a proper fix. > > > > Ben. > > > > It seems the network is behaving quite well with noapic (and no > irqfixup/irqpoll) :-). > > So I shall keep this open until news are available.
Please can you report this bug at <http://bugzilla.kernel.org>, including the fact that 'noapic' works around it. The product should be 'Platform Specific/Hardware' and the component 'i386'. Let us know the bug number so we can keep track of it. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings DNRC Motto: I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
