tags 551315 + pending thanks Hi Steve,
thanks for your bugreport.
On Samstag, 17. Oktober 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The tuxtype package currently declares a Recommends: tuxtype-data-nonfree.
> The package is obviously split for a reason; as such, tuxtype should not be
> pulling it in by default.
> This is a violation of Debian Policy 2.2.1, so marking it as a serious bug.
Doh.
This (tuxtype consisting of non-free parts) has finally been fixed in upstream
svn (yay!) and will be fixed in Debian once the new release is out.
I'm kind of very surprised by this, cause I know it was a correct suggests:
for years, it seems that I accidently moved the tuxtytpe-data-nonfree to
recommends: too, when I moved all suggested fonts there :(
I'm also a bit surprised there is no lintian test to catch these mistakes.
Anyway, will be fixed soon.
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
