On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 01:15:06AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > [ Removing #516057 as it's a closed bug about a bison error. ] > > On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 18:19:51 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Can you please have a look at fixing the segfaults of iasl on non > > i386/amd64 or do you think it would be better to remove the support of > > iasl on non i386/amd64. If so, bochs is the only affected reverse dep of > > iasl if you would restrict iasl to i386/amd64. > > I don't see why iasl would not be able to run on any architecture, > it's just a compiler for byte-code. We ported it some time ago, but > it seems it has regressed in the latest upload (probably problems with > unaligned accesses or little endian assumptions, as before).
yeah, dispite the fact that the patch applied, there were other changes that are causing a consistent segfault. > I might try to take a look at fixing it, but not now. Anyway regarding > bochs, it's not really a problem as iasl is only used when building > architecture independent packages, thus the Build-Depends-Indep. I tried debugging it when the bug first appeared after I uploaded the package with not much success but now I'm definitely lacking the time to look at it. As an emergency fix, if it's not a big deal for bochs, disabling the failing architectures is an option. thanks -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
