On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:41:27PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I've never understood the use of "ls-files -i" without -o, so in that > sense, I have done 2. myself already long time ago. > > In other words, I do not really care that much, and the choice would be > between "0. do not do anything---the patch in question was a bugfix for > longstanding insanity" and your "4. -i without -o didn't make much sense > but now it does and here is the new meaning".
OK, I think the patch I sent elsewhere in the thread should be applied, then, as it should make you, me, and Klaus happy. -Peff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
