On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:10:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:51:06AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:30:57PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote: > > > [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > > > BTW, i don't think it is a good idea to distribute boost binaries built > > > > with a compiler that has never seen the boost regression test suite. > > > > I got uneasy as well but ooking on the boost webpage, there was no newer > > > release yet. > > > here is a pointer to the 1.33.0 release status: > > http://lists.boost.org/boost/2005/07/30375.php > > > > Sure. What do you think about running the testsuite on each build? > > > it is a good idea. > > > the test suite results are produced as html pages. most of the debian > > users would not be interested in them. what about providing a separate > > binary package i.e. libboost-regression? > > Ultimately, what would be most useful from a QA standpoint is a test suite > that can output either a success or failure code during the package build, > and information about which tests failed if any. I'm pretty sure that *no* > users are interested in having the test suite results packaged. :)
i don't master the test suite, i'm currently unable to confirm this can be achieved out-of-the-box. ciao -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
