On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
I can't even get 0.3's problem resolver to accept a solution that removes
libc6, so I found a box running sarge and tried this myself:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ aptitude -s remove libc6
[...]
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 234 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 431MB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y
The following ESSENTIAL packages will be REMOVED!
base-files util-linux perl-base bash login e2fsprogs coreutils apt diff
bsdutils base-passwd dpkg findutils debianutils sed tar grep mount gzip
ncurses-bin hostname sysvinit
WARNING: Performing this action will probably cause your system to break!
Do NOT continue unless you know EXACTLY what you are doing!
To continue, type the phrase "I am aware that this is a very bad idea":
say what?
Abort.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Daniel
Sorry, I'm a twit. I've mostly got out of the habit of filing bugs without
thinking too much, but this one just got away from me. :-)
(I got a couple phone interviews, but I haven't got anything more promising
than that yet, although I'm waiting to hear back from one company)
The research group I work in (bioinformatics, Duke University) is looking
for someone to fill a sys admin/scientific software developer position for
the group. I don't know if you would be interested, but thought I would
mention it.
I can give more details if you want.
If you are interested, send me your cv.
Thanks. Faheem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
