On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:16:57PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:24:10PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > For now, the iceape-dev package still exists and depends on xulrunner-dev, > > which may provide a smooth upgrade path, and your package may build > > properly this way (i.e. a binNMU would work) > > Actually, not. We even need a patch fixing build with xulrunner 1.9.1 > whereas 1.9 works. Not to mention it will expect iceape*.pc, > not the one of xulrunner...
Well, most other packages are trying several different pkg-config files, so it works for most. Anyways, as per the xulrunner plan for *lenny*, only plugins and extensions for iceape should be building against iceape-dev, and therefore should build perfectly fine with xulrunner-dev, modulo the pc check. I really wonder what in OOo fails to build with xulrunner-dev. > > But the iceape-dev package is going to be removed from the archive before > > the squeeze release, so please switch to using xulrunner-dev anyways. > > OK. A bit advance warning would have been *really* nice, though.... Sorry for that, but iceape 2.0 was deemed to be uploaded some day, and iceape 1.1 was even removed from testing by request of the security team a few days ago. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
