On 2005-07-23 09:38:31 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > hmm - a quick glance at the code shows this is another of the ones that > claim it's xterm-compatible (I see some "xterm" and "vt100" literals). > I'd suggest testing that theory with vttest. The only mention of vttest > in the changelog is two years old "largely works".
I tried with tack (I don't have vttest), and IIRC, I found only one problem. There are also problems with the numeric keypad, and also the numeric keypad gives unknown escape sequences. > The source code doesn't contain a terminfo or termcap. Nor does it > contain any real documentation. Perhaps you can file a bug report against > iTerm, suggesting that this be provided. Done. > "xterm-color" might work for you, but I see no reason to change > "xterm-color" to match this - it would then be different from what other > people have come to think of as "xterm-color". Well, http://www.ibb.net/~anne/keyboard.html says that kbs=\177 and kdch1=\E[3~ are the correct values. And currently xterm-color is inconsistent with xterm (that has the above values as expected). And both xterm-xfree86 and xterm-vt220 have kbs=^H, which is incorrect too. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
