-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Sorry if it's not the correct place to ask for it, but given this is
the bug which asked for --enable-kvm to be enabled in QEMU and the
maintainer said he didn't thought it was a good idea until the KVM
support in QEMU was usable, I wondered if we unstable users should now
start to replace KVM (the Debian package) with QEMU (the Debian package).
Is this the case ? Should we go ahead and replace KVM with QEMU or
should we keep our KVM Debian package installed and instead wait for
newer KVM versions to be packaged ?
Sorry, I know that the QEMU maintainer isn't thw KVM maintainer as
well, I was just wondering how should we proceed now or thing things
have changed somewhat regarding this topic.
As far as I can understand from my reading of the KVM development
mailing list, KVM is still ahead of QEMU reagrding a lot of topics,
including features and speed. I just wanted to know if something is
differente regarding the Debian packaging of QEMU and if it should be
used instead of KVM these days.
Regards,
- --
André Luís Lopes
andre...@{andrelop,debian}.org
http://www.andrelop.org/blog/
Public GPG KeyID : 9D1B82F6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAksDNQoACgkQW4/i9Z0bgvZFAgCgkHG9OM4Nr1M/xwnda4EAe7+w
/zsAoKJJWBZ6zbOdZMAQxbWVLWKTCK/M
=Rk9B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
