On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:17:10AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> writes: > > lintian considers all rpath settings an error > No, it doesn't. > Please provide actual details of the problem that you're running into so > that we can determine whether or not this is a case that Lintian should > recognize is valid.
| E: xen-utils-3.4: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/lib/xen-3.4/bin/blktapctrl ${ORIGIN}/../lib | E: xen-utils-3.4: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/lib/xen-3.4/lib/libblktap.so ${ORIGIN} | E: xen-utils-3.4: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/lib/xen-3.4/lib/python/xen/lowlevel/acm.so ${ORIGIN}/../../.. > > while this is not backed by the policy. > Lintian doesn't only check Policy (and has never only checked Policy). As long as it proposes serious as severity, which is only valid for policy violations, it have to. Bastian -- Leave bigotry in your quarters; there's no room for it on the bridge. -- Kirk, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org