On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:17:10AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> writes:
> > lintian considers all rpath settings an error
> No, it doesn't.
> Please provide actual details of the problem that you're running into so
> that we can determine whether or not this is a case that Lintian should
> recognize is valid.

| E: xen-utils-3.4: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath 
./usr/lib/xen-3.4/bin/blktapctrl ${ORIGIN}/../lib
| E: xen-utils-3.4: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath 
./usr/lib/xen-3.4/lib/libblktap.so ${ORIGIN}
| E: xen-utils-3.4: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath 
./usr/lib/xen-3.4/lib/python/xen/lowlevel/acm.so ${ORIGIN}/../../..

> > while this is not backed by the policy.
> Lintian doesn't only check Policy (and has never only checked Policy).

As long as it proposes serious as severity, which is only valid for
policy violations, it have to.

Bastian

-- 
Leave bigotry in your quarters; there's no room for it on the bridge.
                -- Kirk, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to