On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:56:19PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 28/11/09 at 09:38 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:57:21AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Source: nbd
> > > Version: 1:2.9.14-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs
> > > Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > > amd64.
> > 
> > I haven't been able to reproduce this on my system (also an amd64), and
> > I haven't seen it happen on any of the buildd hosts that built
> > 1:2.9.14-2.
> > 
> > Since the particular test that fails has a test client connect to the
> > server on localhost, network-specific strangeness might be the reason
> > why it failed. Therefore, could you explain the details of how stuff is
> > supposed to be functioning?
> 
> Well, I use netfilter to reject most accesses to the outside world. This
> does not affect local communications.
> 
> Does it connect to "localhost" or "127.0.0.1"? DNS resolution might not
> work completely.

localhost.

However, in the mean time, the alpha buildd has failed the build with
the same problem.

I think I'm beginning to understand what's going wrong, and that would
mean that this is a false negative for the test. Since false negatives
are rarely useful, I'm going to make failing the test not a fatal error,
until I've come up with a proper fix (which is going to be somewhat less
trivial)

Thanks,

-- 
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is
trying to fool the system.
  http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to