Hi, On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:52:28AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Hi, Mike. > > 2009/12/7 Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org>: > > Hi Iwamatsu-san > > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:21:22AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > I am now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH CPU(sh4)[0]. > >> > Current postgresql package doesn't support sh4[1]. > >> > I made a patch to revise to be able to build. > >> > I attach patch. Would you apply it? > >> > >> > [0]: > >> > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstable&a=sh4&buildd= > >> > [1]: > >> > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/fetch.php?pkg=xulrunner&arch=sh4&ver=1.9.1.4-1&stamp=1257038103&file=log&as=raw > >> > >> When will you apply this patch? > >> Or do you have the plan applying? > > > > I'm sorry, this bug totally dropped off my attention. I'll try to check > > the patch this week.
A bit late, but here I am. Here are my first obvious comments, before even trying to send that upstream: - Please add the license boilerplate at the top of the files you add, with proper contributor listing. (See the files in the same directory for examples) - ifeq (sh,$(findstring sh,$(OS_TEST))) seems a bit risky. What is the platform name ? sh only ? filter would be better than findstring, then. If it is shsomething, then filter sh% would be better. Now, for a stupid question, does that add support for all the SuperH processors (from SH-1), a subset (as SH-1 and 2 were pretty limited, I would assume from SH-3), or only the latest ones (SH-4 ? SH-5 ?) Would it build on the netbsd port on dreamcast ? Finally, I see there currently is some support for sh/sh3/sh4 in nspr and nss, is that enough? Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
