On 18.12.2009 03:57, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 19:51 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:24:01AM -0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I substituted a much cleaner test in Debian (see the linked bug report)
> > > and suggest you take that change.
> >
> > As near as I can tell, the Debian fix is incorrect because /sys/module/nfsd
> > is only available if nfsd is built as a module. Anyone who has the code
> > built into their kernel will not have this directory.
>
> Anything that *can* be built as a module still appears in /sys/modules
> even if built-in.
Then nfsd must be the exception that proves the rule, because that
change just killed my nfs-kernel-server ("Not starting NFS kernel
daemon: no support in current kernel.").
I'm running 2.6.32 with nfsd compiled in and there is no
"/sys/module/nfsd"
Killing the check make nfsd work again.
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
