Hi Dne Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:53:54 +0000 Robert Lemmen <rober...@semistable.com> napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:23:08AM +0100, Michal ??iha?? wrote:
> > I know there have not been any changes to the secure-delete package for
> > some time, but I hope you're still interested in it. Program smem is
> > part of it and now it is also name of another package and binary which
> > I did upload. I contacted smem upstream, but they think that renaming
> > smem from secure-delete is a better option (low user base, smem is
> > still considered beta for ages). What is your opinion about this?
>
> fully agree, smem is not really of much use (compared to srm), i'll
> rename it and upload a new version the next days
Thanks a lot! Reassigning related bug to secure-delete.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
