Hello Lucas, On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:13:50PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote: > Helge Kreutzmann wrote, On 28/07/05 15:43: > > Package: fetchmail > > Version: N/A; reported 2005-07-28 > > Severity: grave > > Tags: security > > Justification: user security hole > > > > Hello, > > I see that you close CAN-2005-2335 in 6.2.5-16 in unstable, but I > > could not find a bug report for tracking sarge and woody. Please close > > this bug when both are dealt with. > > Isn't the new package version feature in the BTS useful for these kind > of things?
Well, I don't think so. I read in your changelog:
- new upstream patch because of security issue CAN-2005-2335
There is no mention of a bug in the BTS here (no closes#). The machine
I reported from is a woody without fetchmail. But I think you can add
the proper version in retrorespect as well?
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg signed mail preferred
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
pgpBrE41WzUSf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
