-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
what is the use case for Sesame in Virtuoso? IIUC Virtuoso was going to work as a separate backend for Nepomuk (?), independent of Sesame. In other words, does it make sense to put effort into packaging Sesame as a Nepomuk backend? Cheers, Marcus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAktE/G0ACgkQXjXn6TzcAQmHgQCgyz2GqxqjeefmhYY6/sahnmLY x/QAoL1S19HO/rc+tbUvGDaoH7GqLlIq =yv/a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
