Johan Mazel wrote:
> I think that the original code, the one that have been used to build the 
> debian 
> package, is the one from this this website: 
> http://www.drugphish.ch/~jonny/mlpcap.html 
> <http://www.drugphish.ch/%7Ejonny/mlpcap.html>. I figured it because the file 
> mlpcap_0.9.orig.tar.gz from the page of the package 
> http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libmlpcap-ocaml-dev contains the same file 
> README than the mlpcap archive on the 
> http://www.drugphish.ch/~jonny/mlpcap.html 
> <http://www.drugphish.ch/%7Ejonny/mlpcap.html>.
> The version from http://www.drugphish.ch/~jonny/mlpcap.html 
> <http://www.drugphish.ch/%7Ejonny/mlpcap.html> doesn't have this bug.
> 

The two urls seem identical.

> Is it possible that Sylvain le Gall (the maintainer of this package) added a 
> kind of protection to the Debian package that wopuld explain these two 
> behaviours ?
> 

I don't think so. You can check applied patches at:

        http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/mlpcap/0.9-15

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to