On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:59 -0800, Ross Boylan wrote: > Also, it's possible some of the other problems reported in this bug > have > other causes. On the other hand, Debian bug 538819 may be the same > thing. It's not clear if the valgrind output, even with > --trace-children=yes, in that bug was sufficient to catch the real > leak. > I only caught it after I killed the main samba process. To clarify, by "main" I meant the process directly servicing the client (and leaking). That is NOT the master smbd process, the one which launches the others (and, I assume, handles initial incoming requests).
In the tracing I did I killed both the process servicing the client and all of samba (/etc/init.d samba stop). But it was the former that had the main leak. Ross -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
