Mark Nipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hell, I'll arrange shell access if you think it would help any. > I should note here that I've successfully used just scanimage > from the command line and alternate resolutions do work, so it's > purely something related to the GUI code here. But I'm sure you > already knew that! Just thought I'd mention it.
I tried to reproduce the bug with my Epson 2480, only to realize that the 2480 uses a list of resolutions and not the resolution slider. I've contacted the epkowa maintainer, but he has a release to get out the door asap and has no time allocated for debugging :( Does scanimage also segfault if you specify an unsupported resolution ? If you could get scanimage to segfault, *that* backtrace could help a lot more than the xscanimage backtrace. I think the backend goes nuts on unsupported resolutions, but that's just a very wild guess right now. (so forget me if it ends up being something totally different ;) I wish I had more hardware available to do tests :/ JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | <http://www.debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
