Samuel Thibault wrote: > Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit : > > Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit : > > > > * Package name : pthsem > > > Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the > > > existing pth package? > > > > The situation with GNU pth is: > > I guessed so, but still.
[...] > Were I Martin Kögler, I'd even just request GNU to become the new > maintainer of pth. ...which is usually done by writing to <maintain...@gnu.org>. It is counter-productive to start a fork just because GNU pth is unmaintained upstream (it is not an officially "orphaned" GNU package, AFAICS, but that doesn't matter much if it really is neglected). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
