Yaroslav Halchenko <deb...@onerussian.com> (28/01/2010): > From recent private correspondence with you: > ,--- > | On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > | > Yaroslav Halchenko <deb...@onerussian.com> (27/01/2010): > | > > I wonder if you have any tentative plans to upload 1.0.1 into > | > > unstable? > | > Not yet. > `--- > So you have/had no plans to prepare new upload. Fresh upload might > not be of any importance for you, but it is important for me and > nipype users.
Not that it matters much, but it's usually considered polite not to quote private conversations unless otherwise specified. > As you are aware from my previous reports, python-nipype now resides > only in experimental because unstable does not have any version of > networkx which it is compatible with. That forbids users of > unstable and testing (squeeze) of installing/using python-nipype on > their system without adding experimental repository. Poor poor poor users. Guess what, experimental is for stuff not fully tested, so that it can be made sure they don't break existing stuff. -networkx belongs to that category, and it's going to stay there until I'm confident with it. > Not to mention that nipype remains outside of the candidates to be > included in the next Debian release. Freeze isn't tomorrow, or next week, unless I'm mistaken. > I see no reason for rejecting NMU -- any objective reasons? Yes, fixing a wishlist bug does not warrant an NMU. Especially rushed this way. And no need to play with the severity, anyway; wishlist is the right one. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
