On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:43:49AM -0700, nomad Bellcam wrote: > yes. i am not sure if amavisd-new should be responsible, since i > believe spamassassin is running under its control, so to speak, or if > spamassassin should detect that it is running under the control of > another system (amavisd-new), and govern itself accordingly, > restarting its parent when necessary.
I'm not familiar with amavisd-new, and I don't understand why it needs spamassassin to do this work for it. How is it actually using spamassassin in a way that requires amavisd-new to be restarted when data specific to spamassassin changes? Why is reloading spamd not sufficient? I would think that amavisd-new should either utilize spamd, or handle rule updates on its own. noah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
