On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:06:28AM +0100, Henry-Nicolas Tourneur wrote: > > | * License : No license, only a copyright file > > > > Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute? > > > Yeah but what Craig Small said on mentors is that looks very much like a MIT > license - see COPYING file. > His mail is here : > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/02/msg00027.html
But, that's still a license. But look carefully, it says "without fee" in the
license. I don't know if that means "you can use it without paying anyone" or
"you can only redistribute it if you don't charge anyone".
> So it's more some kind of errors from my side because that wasn't very
> clear.
> Should I update this bug to put MIT-like as license ?
It's better to include the whole license if it isn't exactly equal to a
standard license.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
