Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 21:06 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> reassign 527581 autoconf
> notfound 527581 20090611.1
> found 527581 2.65-3
> thanks
>
> As the original author of the patches discussed here, I must say that I
> like JAK's approach even more. However, since it calls autoreconf, it
> should be reassigned to the autoconf (or maybe automake, CC'ed both
> maintainers) package. Since it's still missing a debhelper sequence
> addon, I've attached it to this mail.
There was an addon in the tarballs in the previous emails, it's just
missing in gnome-main-menu because it could not be used there directly
due to not being in the correct location.
Anyway, this approach should allow us to build packages including
autoreconf with a simple
%:
dh --with autoreconf $@
debian/rules file which would be great. If you don't want to libtoolize,
and the package includes the libtool macros (ltversion, etc.) you could
even do an "export LIBTOOLIZE := true" in rules, so autoreconf calls
true instead of libtoolize.
Regards,
Julian
--
Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member
See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
