Package: rlfe
Version: 6.1-1
Severity: minor

When writing programs with "rlfe cat >x.c" instead of "cat >x.c", rlfe
appears to do the wrong thing.  I see no output on stdout (not even
echoes of the characters I'm typing).  If I then "cat x.c", I can see
the bold interaction as well the lines that should be there.

"rlfe cat" works fine if I don't redirect stdout, and "rlfe foo" works
fine for other programs (e.g. ed).

I guess this use case ("rlfe cat >x.c") is simply unsupported?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages rlfe depends on:
ii  libc6                  2.10.2-2em1       GNU C Library: Shared libraries (g
ii  libncurses5            5.7+20090803-2em1 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libreadline6           6.1-1em1          GNU readline and history libraries

rlfe recommends no packages.

rlfe suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100215045439.3449.4706.report...@clio.local

Reply via email to