Package: rlfe Version: 6.1-1 Severity: minor When writing programs with "rlfe cat >x.c" instead of "cat >x.c", rlfe appears to do the wrong thing. I see no output on stdout (not even echoes of the characters I'm typing). If I then "cat x.c", I can see the bold interaction as well the lines that should be there.
"rlfe cat" works fine if I don't redirect stdout, and "rlfe foo" works fine for other programs (e.g. ed). I guess this use case ("rlfe cat >x.c") is simply unsupported? -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages rlfe depends on: ii libc6 2.10.2-2em1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries (g ii libncurses5 5.7+20090803-2em1 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline6 6.1-1em1 GNU readline and history libraries rlfe recommends no packages. rlfe suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100215045439.3449.4706.report...@clio.local