On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 03:25:16PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Michael Banck dixit:
> 
> >Did you do some more work on this, you mentioned
> >
> >01:48 < mira> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    1589 Jan 24 00:47
> >mopac7_1.15-1_mipsel.changes
> 
> Yes, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2010/01/msg00009.html

Thanks for pointing that out.
 
> In short: we could force -g0 for gcc, g++, gfortran, ... on some
> arches' buildds (for some packages only!) but that would require
> deep changes to the infrastructure (the gcc-defaults package) as
> policy mandates building with -g, there is no easy way out of it
> e.g. in cdbs and the mopac7 debian/rules appends -g to FFLAGS as
> well, so a per-arch override would be a little difficult to do.

Well, I'm not set on CDBS, we can migrate mopac7 to debhelper if we can
more easily work around the bug then; mopac7 holds up ghemical's testing
transition as well, so I would like to see this move forward.

Once binutils is fixed, we can remove the -g0 work-around again.


Michael



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100215163939.gc6...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org

Reply via email to