Le lundi 15 février 2010 à 22:02 -0600, Kumar Appaiah a écrit : > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:39:52AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:59:24AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > > > * Explicit dependency on gcc 4.3 removed (Closes: #533807) > > > > but the changelog does not say what this explicit dep has been added... > > > > > > I would also suspect that this is a compiler related issue; for your > > > modifications are only in the control file and changelog. I'll try to > > > probe this further, and let you know. > > > > Upon further probing, I can confirm that if I switch the -O3's in > > debian/rules to -O2, then things start working fine. I'll try to probe > > further and see how to put the blame elsewhere (on the compiler, that > > is). > > OK, after wasting several hours on this, I couldn't really get to the > root of the problem. The trouble is that zgesvd causes several lapack > calls, each of which calls several lapack functions; it is very > difficult to isolate which Blas function actually causes the error. > > Since SVD is something I consider very important, I would request you > to please re-upload Blas with an optimization level of -O2, so that > things remain sane with all the reverse dependencies. OK, thank for your investigation. I will do that then.
> Thanks, and sorry. Sorry for what ? :) Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1266308903.25552.46.ca...@korcula.inria.fr
