On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > I've prepared an NMU for diffutils (versioned as 1:2.9-1.1) and > > > uploaded it to DELAYED/01. Please feel free to tell me if I > > > should delay it longer. > > > > Please delay the NMU several days. > > > > I'm alive, NMUs without asking are not welcome. > > Moved to DELAYED/4-day. I uploaded immediately since it breaks the > build of some source packages. Feel free to upload a -2 with my changes > before the end of that delay.
I have just uploaded 2.9-2 including your patch. I have not included the part about moving to 3.0 source format. Sorry, but I need some time to study that carefully and I need to be confortable with the format before actually using it for the packages I maintain. [ I wonder if it is acceptable to change source format in a NMU at all ]. BTW: I have not closed the bug in the upload, as I'm not convinced that it's a bug in diffutils: If you write a program (dpkg-dev) which relies on the console output of another progam (diff), being that a dangerous thing, then you should be ready to change the first program whenever the console output of the second program changes. I also do not understand the blurb you included in the changelog for the NMU. Why can't we fix this in squeeze? We have Depends and Breaks. I guess some combination of that will work, unless there is something I'm missing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.lnx.4.64.1002161158360.25...@cantor.unex.es
