On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Colin Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > > The uses of TRUE and FALSE only occur in a Debian patch. Perhaps it > > would be more appropriate to simply use 1 and 0 there directly? > > Right. Or should we merge the TRUE/FALSE definitions > into 020_bidi.patch directly, to keep the patch self-explained?
I'd prefer s/TRUE/1/g; s/FALSE/0/g, since those definitions are not particularly standard in C code and aren't in newt's local style. But it's up to Alastair. -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
